culture and rhetoric of the answer poem 1485-1626

CULTURE & RHETORIC HOME | contents | sitemap | | © the culture and rhetoric of the answer poem 2008

subjectsReformation, dialectical, arguments, reformers, John Bale, John Huntington



24

generating a multitude of more formal, scholarly disputations in prose. 28 Since the Reformation took shape in dialectical opposition to Catholicism and reformers often favoured setting the ‘truth’ of their own works in contrast to the erroneous arguments of other religious groups, it is unsurprising that generalised reforming principals filtered through into popular culture through the answer-poetry of the ballad press. As John Huntington suggests in his anti-Protestant poem ‘The Genealogy of Heresy’, which was subsequently answered in prose by John Bale, “Heresye [the Reformation] begate Stryfe and debate”. 29 Pre-Reformation examples of ecclesiastical verse disputes are comparatively rare; one of the few examples being the Upland poems (Jack Upland, Friar Daw’s Reply and Upland’s Rejoinder), which engage in a verse dispute fuelled by the Wycliffian controversy. 30 No post-Reformation verse answers appear to have attained the notoriety of the Martin Marprelate prose pamphlets and the official responses they provoked, but personal, official and quasi-official responses in kind to controversial and polemical verse are nonetheless prolific throughout this period. 31 As such, it seems that answering in kind was perhaps the most utilitarian defence available against abusive or subversive verses.

There are understandable reasons why literary and historical attention to libel has focused predominantly upon official and legal reactions, and upon the threat libelling was considered to pose to individual reputations and to social stability, rather than upon answers in kind specifically. Pauline Croft writes, for instance, that libellers were perceived

28 See Cat. Anon 6, Anon 30, A 62, A 67, H 155, K 192, K 193a-b, L 197, M 216, P 226, R 229, R 232-3 and W 310.

29 A Mysterye of Inyquyte Contayned within the Heretycall Genealogye of Ponce Pantolabus is Here Both Dyclosed & Confuted by Johan Bale (printed at Geneva by Michael Wood, 1548), p.4, STC 1303.

30 See Jack Upland, Friar Daw’s Reply and Upland’s Rejoinder, ed. P. L. Heyworth (OUP, 1968).
31 A few contributions to the Marprelate controversy did appear in the form of exchanged




Google
 


Find this book at Biblio.com  Betterworld Books

AbeBooks.co.uk - New, Secondhand, Rare Books