Mary Cheke, third Earl of Pembroke, Edward, Lord Herbert of Cherbury
<< previous
next >>
263
third Earl of Pembroke, and reminds her of her reputation for adorning her “dainty toes” with lascivious satyr’s nails (ll.5-6).
421
In her answer to Denny she treds a very fine line between self-assertion and self-effacement in her deflection of his abuse and this makes for a highly multivalent poem, several interpretations of which also allow her to proliferate her literary and intellectual presence. By comparison Cheke is the victim of being duped into responding by Harington in order to prove his antifeminist thesis, and her answer only serves to confirm his assertion that women are not suited to enjoy direct access to the Bible.
Lady Mary Cheke
Ostensibly a lighthearted piece of misogyny, Sir John Harington, the younger’s verse beginning ‘Thear was, not serten when, a certayn preacher’ (c.1590s), is actually a piece of tour de force satirical virtuosity. It is designed insidiously to beguile any prospective respondent into proving unwittingly his poem’s central thesis of women’s intellectual inferiority as he deploys craftily the technique of dissimulatio in order to determine and shape the answer he receives to his deliberately and conspicuously erroneous argument.
422 Harington presents his verse as a purposely flawed exercise in biblical exegesis that offers ample opportunity for a corrective response to his antifeminist argument. As May points out, Harington’s satirical persona admits that he is uncertain of his ground and provides his respondent, Lady Mary Cheke, with a straw man.
423
May is not attuned fully, however, to the degree of control that Harington exercises over this ostensible wit combat; for him Cheke’s response is “spirited” while Harington’s poem is
421 ‘A Merry Rime Sent to the Lady Wroth upon the Birth of my L. of Pembroke’s Child, Born in the Spring’, in The English and Latin Poems of Edward, Lord Herbert of Cherbury, ed. G. C. Moore Smith (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968), p.42.
422 Both poems are printed by May (1999), pp.245-6.
423 May (1999), p.149.
<< previous
next >>